[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] "fully HT-aware scheduler" support, 2.5.31-BK-curr

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:

> > - HT-aware affinity.
> >
> > Tasks should attempt to 'stick' to physical CPUs, not logical CPUs.
> Linus disagreed with this before when I discussed it with him, and with
> the current (stupid, non-portable, broken) set_affinity syscall he's
> right.

actually, affinity still works just fine, users can bind tasks to logical
CPUs as well. What i meant was the affinity logic of the scheduler (ie.
affinity decisions done by the scheduler), not the externally visible
affinity API.

> You don't know if someone said "schedule me on cpu 0" because they
> really want to be scheduled on CPU 0, or because they really *don't*
> want to be scheduled on CPU 1 (where something else is running). You
> can't just assume they are equivalent if they are the same physical CPU.

i dont assume that. There's also a fair amount of code in the kernel that
relies on binding threads to particular CPUs, the patch does not break
that in any way.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.210 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site