Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: LTP Nightly BK Test Failure | From | Paul Larson <> | Date | 28 Aug 2002 10:28:30 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 10:10, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:40:03AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote: > > This bk tree covered up to cset 1.523.1.3 and there were several e100 > > Because revisions in BK change if there is parallel development, it's > far more effective if you list a changeset as either ... I didn't think about that, thanks for the tip. I'll make sure to do it like that in future reports. Of course if there's any confusion, the cset numbers I've been giving can be looked up on the linux-2.5 tree at bkbits since I test against an unmodified pull from that tree.
Thanks, Paul Larson
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |