lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: LTP Nightly BK Test Failure
From
Date
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 10:10, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:40:03AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> > This bk tree covered up to cset 1.523.1.3 and there were several e100
>
> Because revisions in BK change if there is parallel development, it's
> far more effective if you list a changeset as either
...
I didn't think about that, thanks for the tip. I'll make sure to do it
like that in future reports. Of course if there's any confusion, the
cset numbers I've been giving can be looked up on the linux-2.5 tree at
bkbits since I test against an unmodified pull from that tree.

Thanks,
Paul Larson


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.042 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site