[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: LTP Nightly BK Test Failure
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 10:10, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:40:03AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> > This bk tree covered up to cset 1.523.1.3 and there were several e100
> Because revisions in BK change if there is parallel development, it's
> far more effective if you list a changeset as either
I didn't think about that, thanks for the tip. I'll make sure to do it
like that in future reports. Of course if there's any confusion, the
cset numbers I've been giving can be looked up on the linux-2.5 tree at
bkbits since I test against an unmodified pull from that tree.

Paul Larson

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.031 / U:1.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site