Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: VM changes added to performance patches for 2.4.19 | Date | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:02:35 -0700 | From | Cliff White <> |
| |
> Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>: > > Would you be so kind as to attempt to quantify that? > > Ummm... I'm not sure if you're making fun or me? I haven't done any objective > tests so I can't quantify it ?? > > I just found the responsiveness of the machine a little better and don't have > the resources, time or inclination to test it with a benchmark. It's my > understanding that the -aa patch performed better on benchmarks, but that some > people reported the responsiveness was better with -rmap anyway. I'd agree with > the latter statement. I offer both patches with mine so if people want to try my > patch and feel strongly either way they can choose. My aim is to optimise system > response for single cpu desktops, not multi cpu servers. > > Con. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Con, Thanks for the work, and nice web page! To help with the testing, i have taken the liberty of adding your 2.4.19-ck3 patch to the OSDL's Patch LifeCycle Manager. It's patch # 768. I've queued up a couple of the basic tests against it, (dbench, dbt1 ) If you want to add future versions and get some testing run, see http://osdl.org/cgi-bin/plm - it's really easy, and you can use OSDL to make up for your lack of hardware. We do focus more on multi-cpu systems, but we're always interested in scheduler tests.
cliffw
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |