Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: readsw/writesw readsl/writesl | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 27 Aug 2002 18:25:24 +0100 |
| |
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 08:30, David S. Miller wrote: > The only reason insl() exists is because the x86 has special > instructions to perform that operation. > > It used to be an optimization when cpus were really slow.
readsl becomes relevant once people start shipping bridges that can do asynchronous pci mmio read or burst mode to order however
I wonder if thats something we should plan for now ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |