[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Preempt note in the logs

On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Dag Nygren wrote:
> Anyway:
> - I am not running xfs, but I do run resiserfs.
> - I also have the ck2 patch that includes the low latency patch,
> could that be it?

So let's be clear on that:

2.4.19+preempt + reiserfs = charm
2.4.19+preempt + ck2 = possibly no problem, dunno
2.4.19+preempt + ck2 + reiserfs = bad dude

ck2 seems to introduce a problem that reiserfs triggers. It's not a
solution to say anything against reiserfs here, never fix the symptoms,
but the root cause...

Have a look at ck2 then...

--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.030 / U:27.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site