Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 24 Aug 2002 14:01:30 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: IDE janitoring comments |
| |
Yep, just be careful of how to decouple the hwif->iops from procfs for pci and the general lameness of x86 centric issues.
On 24 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 16:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > - Do we really want to keep all those _P versions around ? > > A quick grep showed _only_ by the non-portable x86 specific > > recovery timer stuff that taps ISA timers (well, I think ports > > 0x40 and 0x43 and an ISA timer). I would strongly suggest to > > I'd like to keep them around for the moment. They should be using > udelay() but thats a general issue with _p inb/outb etc. > > > After much thinking about the above, I came to the conslusion > > we probably want to just kill all the IN_BYTE, OUT_BYTE, etc. > > Agreed entirely > > > > Also, getting rid of the _P version would make things a lot > > easier as well here too. > > What currently uses the _P versions ? >
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |