Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 25 Aug 2002 00:36:49 +1000 | From | conman@kolivas ... | Subject | Re: VM changes added to performance patches for 2.4.19 |
| |
Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>: > Would you be so kind as to attempt to quantify that?
Ummm... I'm not sure if you're making fun or me? I haven't done any objective tests so I can't quantify it ??
I just found the responsiveness of the machine a little better and don't have the resources, time or inclination to test it with a benchmark. It's my understanding that the -aa patch performed better on benchmarks, but that some people reported the responsiveness was better with -rmap anyway. I'd agree with the latter statement. I offer both patches with mine so if people want to try my patch and feel strongly either way they can choose. My aim is to optimise system response for single cpu desktops, not multi cpu servers.
Con. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |