lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]


Dan Kegel wrote:

>You can actually consider posix AIO using sigtimedwait() to pick up completion
>notices to fit the definition of completion port if you squint a bit.
>
Except that signal queues are far too short to be useful for c10k. It's
also not possible to allocate a queue (signal number) in a thread safe
manner.

Posix AIO is a horrid interface. Ben has done much better.

[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.180 / U:1.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site