Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:40:50 -0700 | From | John Gardiner Myers <> | Subject | Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)] |
| |
Dan Kegel wrote:
>You can actually consider posix AIO using sigtimedwait() to pick up completion >notices to fit the definition of completion port if you squint a bit. > Except that signal queues are far too short to be useful for c10k. It's also not possible to allocate a queue (signal number) in a thread safe manner.
Posix AIO is a horrid interface. Ben has done much better.
[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
|  |