[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization

Dave Hansen wrote..
>Mala Anand wrote:
>> The third scope would be measuring this patch in a workload environment.
>> We measured it in a web serving workload and found that we get 0.7%
>> improvement.

>First of all, the patch doesn't apply at all against the current
>bitkeeper tree. I can post the exact one I used if you like.

>I tried this under our Specweb99 setup. Here's a snippet of
>readprofile with, then without the patch:

>alloc:free ratio: 1.226
>(__kfree_skb+alloc_skb)/total = 3.14%

>alloc:free ratio: 0.348
>(__kfree_skb+alloc_skb)/total = 2.79%

>You can see the entire readprofile here:


>No, I don't know why I have so much idle time.

Readprofile ticks are not as accurate as the cycles I measured.
Moreover readprofile can give misleading information as it profiles
on timer interrupts. The alloc_skb and __kfree_skb call memory
management routines and interrupts are disabled in many parts of that code.
So I don't trust the readprofile data.


Mala Anand
IBM Linux Technology Center - Kernel Performance
Phone:838-8088; Tie-line:678-8088

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.273 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site