[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] printk simultaneous oops disentangling
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:51:14AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:09:18PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Here's a patch to stop multiple simultaneous oopses on an SMP system from
> > interleaving with and overwriting bits of each other. It only permits lock
> > breaking if the printk lock is held by the same CPU.
> This is still wrong. It should attempt to acquire the locks with a timeout
> before trampling on them, as there may be a printk or other console output
> in progress on the other cpu.

/me must be having a bad week

The patch is actually right, but bust_spinlocks still blindly stops on locks
that may not need to be stomped on.

"You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.030 / U:4.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site