[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: large page patch (fwd) (fwd)
    In article <>,
    Rik van Riel <> wrote:

    | Suppose somebody sends you a patch which implements a nice
    | algorithm that just happens to be patented by that same
    | somebody. You don't know about the patent.
    | You integrate the patch into the kernel and distribute it,
    | one year later you get sued by the original contributor of
    | that patch because you distribute code that is patented by
    | that person.
    | Not having some protection in the license could open you
    | up to sneaky after-the-fact problems.
    | Having a license that explicitly states that people who
    | contribute and use Linux shouldn't sue you over it might
    | prevent some problems.

    Unlikely as this is, since offering the patch would probably be
    (eventually) interpreted as giving you the right to use it under GPL, I
    think this is a valid concern.

    Maybe some lawyer could add the required words and it could become the
    LFSL v1.0 (Linux Free Software License). Although FSF would probably buy
    into a change if the alternative was creation of a Linux license. There
    are people there who are in touch with reality.
    bill davidsen <>
    CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.021 / U:38.968 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site