Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:14:45 +0200 | From | Vojtech Pavlik <> | Subject | Re: IDE? |
| |
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:06:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 14:27, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > Even nicer? Easier to add new devices? Not having switch(deviceid) > > everywhere? Don't know. I believe they're better. In any case it's a lot > > of good work thrown away, yours or mine. :( > > I don't mind a few deviceid switches. I don't find them annoying and > I'll take the stability of using known good code with the daft bits like > the rate filter while loop fixed over the unknowns of changing the code. > > Once its in 2.4 and 2.5 and it works then I'm all ears, because at that > point we can actively quantify and test for regressions
I can wait. I've done the rewrite back in 2000, so a couple more months ... Also, I don't necessarily push it into 2.4. However, if you want to keep a common IDE base in both, there is no other way.
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |