Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [BK] [2.5] reiserfs changeset 2 of 3 | Date | Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:00:50 +0400 (MSD) | From | (Hans Reiser) |
| |
Hello!
This changeset corrects logic in reiserfs code that calculates amount of blocks file will take. Please apply. You can get it from bk://thebsh.namesys.com/reiser3-linux-2.5
Diffstat: inode.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Plain text patch: # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: Linux kernel tree # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher. # This patch includes the following deltas: # ChangeSet 1.500 -> 1.501 # fs/reiserfs/inode.c 1.63 -> 1.64 # # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log # -------------------------------------------- # 02/08/20 green@angband.namesys.com 1.501 # Corrected calculation of amount of blocks that file occupies on reiserfs. # -------------------------------------------- # diff -Nru a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c --- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c Tue Aug 20 13:58:51 2002 +++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c Tue Aug 20 13:58:51 2002 @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ inode->i_blocks = sd_v1_blocks(sd); inode->i_generation = le32_to_cpu (INODE_PKEY (inode)->k_dir_id); blocks = (inode->i_size + 511) >> 9; - blocks = _ROUND_UP (blocks, inode->i_blksize >> 9); + blocks = _ROUND_UP (blocks, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize >> 9); if (inode->i_blocks > blocks) { // there was a bug in <=3.5.23 when i_blocks could take negative // values. Starting from 3.5.17 this value could even be stored in - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |