[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pdc20265 problem.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:27:25PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 02:47, Nick Orlov wrote:
> >
> > > <marcelo@plucky.distro.conectiva> (02/07/19 1.646)
> > > Fix wrong #ifdef in ide-pci.c: Was causing problems with FastTrak
> >
> > Because of this fix my Promise 20265 became ide0 instead of ide2.
> > Is there any reason to mark pdc20265 as ON_BOARD controller?
> How about because it can be and it should be checked. I don't know what
> is going on with the ifdef in your case to cause this but its not as
> simple as it seems

Why pdc20265 is so special ? All other Promises marked as OFF_BOARD...

And what determines how id will be assigned to controllers if both of
them are ON_BOARD ?

With best wishes,
Nick Orlov.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.103 / U:1.088 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site