lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] (0/4) Entropy accounting fixes
Date

> > 1. You create a problem for in kernel users of random numbers.
> > 2. You forgo the benefit of randomness by concurrent access to
> > /dev/urandom 3. You will not benefit from hardware random number
> > generators as easily.
>
> You lost me. The kernel of course has "client" access to the internal
> pool. And since the userspace reads from /dev/random, it benefits

The kernel users of random numbers may be unable to block.
Thus the kernel has to have a PRNG anyway.
You may as well export it.

> from HRNG just the same way it does now. Point 2 is somewhat obscure
> to me. The kernel has only one observer to deal with, in theory.

In theory. In practice what goes out through eg. the network is
most important. Additional accesses to a PRNG bitstream unknown
outside make it harder to predict the bitstream.

Regards
Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans