lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] O(1) sys_exit(), threading, scalable-exit-2.5.31-A6

--On Monday, August 19, 2002 08:36:24 PM +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
wrote:

> well, this means that we'd still have to iterate through both lists in
> wait4(), and we'd have to maintain the ptrace list(s) in all the relevant
> codepaths - does this buy us anything relative to -B4?

The lists would constitute the tasks that wait4() should consider, at
least. And maintaining the list wouldn't be any more work than the
current reparenting. I do admit that I don't see a significant win,
codewise, other than aesthetics.

In looking at the code I was wondering something. What happens to the real
parent of a ptraced task when it calls wait4()? If that's its only child,
won't it return ECHILD?

Dave McCracken

======================================================================
Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059
dmccr@us.ibm.com T/L 678-3059

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.081 / U:2.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site