Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:54:29 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: klibc and logging |
| |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 06:59:02AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I really think this is a bad idea. The kmsg device has different > properties -- for example, you're supposed to tag things with the > message importance. It really matches the syslog(3) interface better. > Also, the special case makes me nervous.
Without something like this, it means that effectively the "echo" command wouldn't be useable, or you'd have to pipe the output of all scripts through some program/to /dev/kmsg.
Or we just forget logging the messages from initramfs scripts.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |