[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: cerberus errors on 2.4.19 (ide dma related)
Preempt doesn't seem to be the culprit.  Reran the test without using
preempt and I got MEMORY errors within 22 seconds at udma2. So preempt
is not the problem here.

On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 05:19, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> 2.4.19-preempt
> All bets are off because who knows what preempt is doing to the state
> machines and in PIO you are dead.
> You can not delay transaction of data between interrupts w/o having the
> transport help out. But the preempt don't get it.
> If you push your request size down to 8k or to a page you preempt problems
> will go away, only because granularity of requests. And the price is
> performance goes in the tank. But this is preempt so who cares.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.096 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site