[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] (0/4) Entropy accounting fixes

    On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
    > But it will get data of _equal quality_ to the current approach from
    > /dev/urandom.

    So what?

    If you make /dev/random useless ("but you can use /dev/urandom instead")
    then we should not have it.

    > > Are you seriously trying to say that a TSC running at a gigahertz cannot
    > > be considered to contain any random information just because you think you
    > > can time the network activity so well from the outside?
    > Yes. The clock of interest is the PCI bus clock, which is not terribly
    > fast next to a gigabit network analyzer.

    Be realistic. This is what I ask of you. We want _real_world_ security,
    not a completely made-up-example-for-the-NSA-that-is-useless-to-anybody-

    All your arguments seem to boil down to "people shouldn't use /dev/random
    at all, they should use /dev/urandom".

    Which is just ridiculous.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.023 / U:107.724 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site