[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: IDE?
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 01:09, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > I actually don't think it's the people as much as it is the ridiculous
> > linkages inside ide.c and the hugely complicated rules. The code is messy.
> So of all the people you know floating around in "active hacker" state, who
> seems like the sort of person who could handle this mess? If there is no
> person, is there a description which is more specific than "wanted: person
> who wants thankless abusive non-payed job to clean up what is inherently a
> mess"?

IMHO you need
- An understanding of ATA (which is the protocol
equivalent of object oriented cobol)
- The ability to work with vendors (it needs to be someone
at a company because many vendors won't NDA with
individuals even if they are happy with GPL code off
their data sheet)
- Someone who has taste in code and understands how to
beat code into shape without breaking it
- The ability to deduce the other errata the vendor forgot
to tell you about or doesn't want to admit exists for
fear of US lawsuits (I kid you not)
- A good understanding of the block layer and its locking
especially because IDE has a heirarchy of contention
two drives one bus
two channels one DMA engine
two controllers one I/O at a time
ISA IRQ sharing locks

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.107 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site