[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] user-vm-unlock-2.5.31-A2

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> The child (Y) it forks off, however, may use thread (Z) for some
> subtask. Not pthreads, it might be just a clone-by-hand. So it may be
> doing an exit while it's address space is still actively used by another
> thread - but just because (X) wanted to use CLONE_SETTID to get the
> child information on (Y) does _not_ mean that it's address space (and
> thus that of Z) would somehow be updated at its exit.

yes, now i understand. When using raw clone() then indeed a CLEARTID set
up in X's context does not necesserily have any meaning in Y's (and Z's)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:1.990 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site