[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] add buddyinfo /proc entry
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 07:31:44PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> Not _another_ proc entry!
> Yes, not another one. Why not move these to driverfs, where they
> belong.

Could you show us how this particular situation might be laid out in a
driverfs/kfs/gregfs tree?

It's great that you keep suggesting this, but we have another
chicken-and-egg problem.

The problem with driverfs today is that it isn't worth it for _me_ to
use it to just get this one, single thing. If I used driverfs right
now, the only thing that I would get out of it would be ... buddyinfo!
How is it worth my while to use it on a shared machine where most
people probably won't be mounting driverfs, or _want_ it mounted as
the default?

> (ignore the driverfs name, it should be called kfs, or some such
> thing, as stuff more than driver info should go there, just like
> these entries.)

If even its most ardent supporters don't like its name...

Dave Hansen

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.089 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site