Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:21:33 +0100 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)] |
| |
Dan Kegel wrote: > You can actually consider posix AIO using sigtimedwait() to pick up > completion notices to fit the definition of completion port if you > squint a bit.
... with the bonus that it fits comfortably into a sigtimedwait() loop that's waiting for non-AIO things too.
-- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |