Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:58:26 +0100 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | [PATCH] lockd shouldn't call posix_unblock_lock here |
| |
nlmsvc_notify_blocked() is only called via the fl_notify() pointer which is only called immediately after we already did a locks_delete_block(), so calling posix_unblock_lock() here is always a NOP. Please apply.
diff -urpNX dontdiff linux-2.5.31/fs/lockd/svclock.c linux-2.5.31-willy/fs/lockd/svclock.c --- linux-2.5.31/fs/lockd/svclock.c 2002-08-01 14:16:16.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.5.31-willy/fs/lockd/svclock.c 2002-08-15 07:32:19.000000000 -0700 @@ -472,7 +472,6 @@ nlmsvc_notify_blocked(struct file_lock * struct nlm_block **bp, *block; dprintk("lockd: VFS unblock notification for block %p\n", fl); - posix_unblock_lock(fl); for (bp = &nlm_blocked; (block = *bp); bp = &block->b_next) { if (nlm_compare_locks(&block->b_call.a_args.lock.fl, fl)) { nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 0); -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |