lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements
Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> > Mutating the language, long-term, so that it looks less like sh [...]
>
> That doesn't solve any of the more fundamental problems.

Correct, it doesn't.

> 1) We still have 3 config parsers, which produce slightly different
> .config files.

Yes.

> 2) To integrate a new driver, you have to touch at least 3 files:
> Config.in, Config.help, Makefile. Properly configuring and building a
> driver outside of the tree is painful to impossible.

Yes.

> The problems are really not simple, the current config language is very
> limited, [...]

I don't think anyone who actually understands the config system would
argue these points, but we are limited by practical constraints to making
incremental improvements only.

Greg.
--
the price of civilisation today is a courageous willingness to prevail,
with force, if necessary, against whatever vicious and uncomprehending
enemies try to strike it down. - Roger Sandall, The Age, 28Sep2001.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.131 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site