[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Get rid of shell based parsers?

[Sam Ravnborg]
> Where comes the requirement that we shall keep the existing shell
> based config parsers?

I don't make that argument - mconfig is the superior solution by far -
but it is certainly the path of least resistance.

As pertains to CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL and " (EXPERIMENTAL)", it *is*
possible to add such a feature to the shell-based parsers by changing
the syntax slightly - specifically to lose the '$' on dependencies.

Changing the syntax *does* have ramifications when it means adapting
three separate parsers, but it can be done.

> Remembering the CML2 war there were no serious objections about
> shifting away from shell based parsers (but certainly a lot about
> the alternative selected).

It would have been a big change and a big flag day, and among other
problems, the rulebase conversion issue was handled wrong. Eric
refused to start from a 1-1 equivalent rulebase, preferring to tweak
the rulebase as he went along - partly just to fix bugs, partly to
show off his new capabilities. Unfortunately, without the
apples-to-apples comparison, many people distrusted the new system,
superior though it was in many ways.

This is the primary lesson to be learned from CML2. Anyone trying to
redesign a subsystem such as the kernel config system needs to keep it
in mind. (Yes, I know from the rest of your message that you learned

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.073 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site