lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cdrom sane fallback vs 2.4.20-pre1
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, James Bottomley wrote:

| rddunlap@osdl.org said:
| > and that's precisely the wrong attitude IMO.
|
| I wasn't expressing an opinion, just stating what could and could not be done
| in 2.4.

I guess that at least Jens and I (not trying to speak for Jens)
see it as a style issue and somewhat as an education issue.
At least we both used /IMO/i.

| > I was glad to see that Marcelo asked about the hardcoded values. They
| > hurt.
|
| Well, this is a rather big and particularly rancid can of worms. If you look
| a little further, you'll see that cdrom.h has its own definition of the
| (effectively SCSI) struct request_sense that sr.c uses, yet the sense key is
| defined in scsi/scsi.h. Then you notice that cdrom.h also duplicates all of
| the scsi commands with a GPCMD_ prefix.
|
| If you'd like to take this particular can of worms off somewhere, clean it out
| and return it neatly labelled, I'd be more than grateful...just don't take the
| lid off too close to me.

I'm not sure that it could ever get by Jens, but I'll take a look at it.

--
~Randy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.051 / U:3.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site