[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0
David Mosberger wrote:
>>>>>>On 13 Aug 2002 12:52:11 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <> said:
> >> The clone() system call cannot be used by portable applications
> >> *AT ALL*, since it inherently needs a user-space assembly
> >> wrapper. It's just a matter of how you define the interface to
> >> the assembly wrapper.
> The function call issue is a separate question though. If you want to
> argue that the libc clone() wrapper is broken, fine by me. (BTW:
> wasn't that you who complained about platform-specific Linux syscalls
> recently? ;-)

I was, however, the flaws that you complained of had nothing to do with
the syscall -- it's all in the syscall wrapper (which is required for
clone(), like it or not.)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.087 / U:34.512 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site