lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0
mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar)  wrote on 13.08.02 in <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208131918360.4369-100000@localhost.localdomain>:

> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Erik Andersen wrote:
>
> > > First the name souns horrible. What about spawn_thread or create_thread
> > > instead? it's not our good old clone and not a lookalike, it's some
> > > pthreadish monster..
> >
> > How about "clone2"?
>
> ni fact it was sys_clone2() first time around, but Ulrich Drepper
> requested another name for it because in glibc it collided with ia64 where
> clone2() is something different. So whatever name there is going to be, it
> should not be sys_clone2().

clone_and_start() or clone_and_go() or something along those lines,
perhaps?

MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.143 / U:3.976 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site