Messages in this thread | | | Date | 13 Aug 2002 22:35:00 +0200 | From | (Kai Henningsen) | Subject | Re: [patch] clone_startup(), 2.5.31-A0 |
| |
mingo@elte.hu (Ingo Molnar) wrote on 13.08.02 in <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208131918360.4369-100000@localhost.localdomain>:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Erik Andersen wrote: > > > > First the name souns horrible. What about spawn_thread or create_thread > > > instead? it's not our good old clone and not a lookalike, it's some > > > pthreadish monster.. > > > > How about "clone2"? > > ni fact it was sys_clone2() first time around, but Ulrich Drepper > requested another name for it because in glibc it collided with ia64 where > clone2() is something different. So whatever name there is going to be, it > should not be sys_clone2().
clone_and_start() or clone_and_go() or something along those lines, perhaps?
MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |