lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: large page patch (fwd) (fwd)
Date
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 02:32 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > Having a license that explicitly states that people who
> > > contribute and use Linux shouldn't sue you over it might
> > > prevent some problems.
> >
> > Such a clause is what IBM insisted on having in ITS open source license.
> > You sue, your rights under this license terminate, which is basically
> > automatic grounds for a countersuit for infringement.
>
> Note that I personally think the "you screw with me, I screw with you"
> approach is a fine one. After all, the GPL is based on "you help me, I'll
> help you", so it fits fine.
>
> However, it doesn't work due to the distributed nature of the GPL. The FSF
> tried to do something like it in the GPL 3.0 discussions, and the end
> result was a total disaster. The GPL 3.0 suggestion was something along
> the lines of "you sue any GPL project, you lose all GPL rights". Which to
> me makes no sense at all - I could imagine that there might be some GPL
> project out there that _deserves_ getting sued(*) and it has nothing to do
> with Linux.

So this is another argument in favor of having the patent addendum be
separate then. Software patents as a class are basically evil, and valid
ones are clearly the exception. Copyrights are NOT evil (or at least are
inherently more tightly focused), and valid ones are the rule.

There is also the legal precent of patent pools, which are an established
legal concept as far as I know. Joining a patent pool means you license all
your patents to get a license to all their patents, and bringing a patent
suit within the pool would violate your agreement and cut you off from the
pool. (If I'm wrong, somebody correct me on this please.)

The open source community's problem is that it historically hasn't had the
entry fee to participate in this sort of arrangement, and solving it on a
company by company basis doesn't help the community. These days open source
has a lot more resources than it used to.

I think Red Hat is actually trying to help on this front by getting patents
and licensing them for use in GPL code. By itself, this is not a solution,
but it could be the seed of one...

Right, at this point I need to go bug a lawyer, I think...

> Linus
>
> (*) "GNU Emacs, the defendent, did inefariously conspire to play
> towers-of-hanoy, while under the guise of a harmless editor".

But remember, you can't spell "evil" without "vi"... :)

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.112 / U:5.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site