Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:09:41 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: pte_chain leak in rmap code (2.5.31) |
| |
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Thomas Molina wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > > > > Note the strange use of continue and break which both achieve the same! > > > What was meant to happen (judging from rmap-13c) is that we break > > Excellent hunting! Thank you! > Any chance this is the cause of the following?
Yes, quite possible.
> From: Adam Kropelin <akropel1@rochester.rr.com> > Date: 2002-08-12 2:54:31
> But we do have a repeatable inconsistency happening with ntpd and > memory pressure. That may be related, but in that case it's probably > related to mlock().
kind regards,
Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |