lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements
Hi,

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tom Rini wrote:

> > More examples of the cml1 limitations can be found in arch/ppc/config.in -
> > a single choice statement needs to be splitted into multiple choice
> > statements.
>
> Er, which are you referring to here? All of the choice statements are
> done for clarity here. :) Tho I was (and have been) pondering creating
> arch/ppc/platforms/Config-[468]xx.in, which would rather nicely move all
> of the options related to IBM 4xx processors to one file, Motorola 8xx
> to another, and general PPC's nicely.

There is still a bit of overlap. Roughly it's possible to sort the machine
types by cpu type, but IMO it's not the best solution. I think it would be
better to sort them by general machine type.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans