Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:15:55 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements |
| |
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:13:51AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > More examples of the cml1 limitations can be found in arch/ppc/config.in - > > > a single choice statement needs to be splitted into multiple choice > > > statements. > > > > Er, which are you referring to here? All of the choice statements are > > done for clarity here. :) Tho I was (and have been) pondering creating > > arch/ppc/platforms/Config-[468]xx.in, which would rather nicely move all > > of the options related to IBM 4xx processors to one file, Motorola 8xx > > to another, and general PPC's nicely. > > There is still a bit of overlap. Roughly it's possible to sort the machine > types by cpu type, but IMO it's not the best solution. I think it would be > better to sort them by general machine type.
Er, 'general machine type' ?
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |