[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 6/12] hold atomic kmaps across generic_file_read
    On Monday 12 August 2002 22:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > >
    > > That's the whole point of this: it's not a bug anymore. (It's a feature.)
    > Well, it's a feature only if _intentional_, so I think Rusty's argument
    > was that we should call it something else than "copy_to/from_user()" if
    > we're ready to accept the fact that it fails for random reasons..

    Right, I meant to follow up and correct that - the caller has the
    responsibility of detecting the short transfer and taking corrective
    action, but on the other hand, maybe the caller always had that

    But for the cases where the caller 'knows' it holds no locks, it's
    better to oops if that's untrue as Rusty said, plus the inc/dec is
    saved in that case.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.033 / U:2.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site