lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] config language dep_* enhancements
Hi,

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Tom Rini wrote:

> > A bit more flexibility certainly wouldn't hurt. :)
>
> What does that gain however? And it wouldn't make as much sense to
> offer the IBM Spruce (750) next to the IBM Walnut (405GP).

You weren't forced to sort them by cpu type. Maybe it works as is, you
should know that better than me.
I only used it as an example, because my tool has problems to
automatically convert this construct into something useful (e.g. because
of CONFIG_WILLOW in 2 seperate choice statements).

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.081 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site