Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:52:43 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: Funding GPL projects or funding the GPL? |
| |
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, David Schwartz wrote:
> > >First, we were talking about written for free vs. written to make money. > >Second, the quality of the output depends on the quality of the process, > >not how much you pay for it. Equally likely isn't what I said, either. > > I give one person $2,000 and one person $50,000 to buy a car. Would you > argue that they are equally likely to come back with quality cars?
If you send both to area famous for seedy dealers? Yeah - both will come back with painted pieces of shit, unless they'll have uncommon luck to find something better. And that's a *BIG* luck.
Face it - in a lot of categories the market of software is market of snake oil. When all alternatives on the market are utter crap and that situation hadn't been changed in decades... And I mean all - be they commercial, free, for Linux, Solaris, Windows, VMS, HP-UX, yaddda, yadda; it doesn't matter.
It's nice to pretend that this is not the case. Just don't forget to pray when you view a PDF or PostScript document from some site. Or listen to mp3. Or view a picture in one of $BIGNUM formats.
And don't give me that crap about Sturgeon's Law - for many categories we are talking about 100%, not 90%. Sheesh...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |