[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Diff b/w 32bit & 64-bit
Jamie Lokier writes:

>>>> don't cast from "foo *" to "bar *" if sizeof(foo)<sizeof(bar)
> Oliver Neukum explained that you shouldn't dereference a pointer to a
> larger type because of alignment issues on some machines.
> sizeof(foo)<sizeof(bar) captures this rule just fine for the basic data
> types (char, int etc.).

Yes, that was the intent.

> But for structures, it's actually possible to have a smaller type with a
> larger alignment requirement, and vice versa:
> struct small { double x; };
> struct large { char y [11]; };
> Also, it is certainly permitted to cast "char *" to "int *" if you know
> that the underlying object is an "int" or something compatible with one.
> So, the general rule `don't cast from "foo *" to "bar *" if
> sizeof(foo)<sizeof(bar)' is wrong, and is routinely not followed.
> An alternative rule might be `never dereference a "bar *" if it might
> not have the correct alignment for "bar" on any platform'.

Got a shorter way to say that? In less than one line, give
a rule that will keep x86-centric programmers from getting
hurt by the alignment restrictions.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.060 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site