lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BKL removal


On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> one struct file per open(), yes. however, fork() shares a struct file,
> as does unix domain fd passing. so we need protection between different
> processes. there's some pretty good reasons to want to use a semaphore
> to protect the struct file (see fasync code.. bleugh).

??? What exactly do you want to protect there?

ObAnotherQuestion: no, new_inode() doesn't need BKL.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans