[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BKL removal

    On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

    > one struct file per open(), yes. however, fork() shares a struct file,
    > as does unix domain fd passing. so we need protection between different
    > processes. there's some pretty good reasons to want to use a semaphore
    > to protect the struct file (see fasync code.. bleugh).

    ??? What exactly do you want to protect there?

    ObAnotherQuestion: no, new_inode() doesn't need BKL.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.033 / U:65.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site