[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove BKL from driverfs
    CC'ing Al for comments...

    Greg KH wrote:
    > bleah, a proliferation of a zillion little spinlocks all across the
    > kernel is not my idea of fun :(

    A zillion locks each with a single purpose is a lot more fun than 1
    lock with a zillion different uses.

    > I don't know if a simple spinlock can help us here. Look at
    > driverfs_get_inode() and follow that into the vfs layer. Make sure all
    > of that is race safe (and isn't currently relying on the BKL.) I'll
    > defer to Al Viro's opinion about this, as I don't quite know all of the
    > side effects going on at this moment in time.

    OK, I agree a simple spinlock is not the way to go because I now see
    the sleepable operations in there. But, I don't think
    driverfs_get_inode() needs any more locking. The inode that it
    references is freshly allocated and my only concern would be about
    access from the inode_in_use list. Maybe down()ing i_sem will provide
    a bit more protection, but unless the access through inode_in_use is
    already a problem, i_sem isn't needed. Any thoughts, Al?

    Dave Hansen

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.023 / U:108.892 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site