lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kernel timers vs network card interrupt
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Xinwen - Fu wrote:

> Hi, all,
> I'm curious that if a network card interrupt happens at the same
> time as the kernel timer expires, what will happen?
>
> It's said the kernel timer is guaranteed accurate. But if
> interrupts are not masked off, the network interrupt also should get
> response when a kernel timer expires. So I don't know who will preempt
> who.
>
> Thanks for information!
>
> Xinwen Fu

The highest priority interrupt will get serviced first. It's the timer.
Interrupts are serviced in priority-order. Hardware "remembers" which
ones are pending so none are lost if some driver doesn't do something
stupid.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson

Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).

Windows-2000/Professional isn't.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog