lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.28 small REQ_SPECIAL abstraction


    On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
    >
    > I was referring to the block layer, not the SCSI layer. The broken
    > changes were applied to the block layer after all, I had not even
    > noticed that the SCSI one was broken.

    Heh.

    Anyway, I don't think the situation is "wrong" per se. Martin took code
    that was generic from SCSI, and moved it to the common place. In the
    process, you noticed that the original code was broken. Downsides? I guess
    it gets fixed now. Sounds reasonable to me, and we should just be happy
    that these things get noticed eventually, even if the reason for noticing
    it is the "wrong" one.

    Linus

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:7.879 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site