[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as
> you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of
> chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.

So we just need to build a directed graph, detect edges without
existing nodes (someone changed the initcall, we depend on) and
cycles (someone messed up the ordering) as errors, sort the
resulting graph toplogically and dump it as a sequence.

This is no rocket science and we have two tools, which does this
all for us (make and tsort, which create a warning for both cases).

The hard part is to CREATE all the dependencies and check and
double check them with the maintainers.


Ingo Oeser
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.096 / U:1.264 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site