Messages in this thread |  | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH -ac] Panicking in morse code | | Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2002 07:13:03 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 26 July 2002 06:52, jdow wrote: > From: "Daniel Phillips" <phillips@arcor.de> > > On Thursday 25 July 2002 14:51, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > ??? If the length is 1..5 I suspect you could use the top two bits and fit > > > the whole thing in a byte. But since bytes work well, use the top three > > > bits for length without the one bit offset. Still a big win over strings, > > > although a LOT harder to get right by eye. > > > > Please read back through the thread and see how 255 different 7 bit codes > > complete with lengths can be packed into 8 bits. > > It appears someone is under the misapprehension that Morse characters are > all 5 elements or less. "SK" is an example of a six element meta-character, > one of a set that needs caring for, "...-.-".
Need I point out that we are now perfectly positioned to invent the additional morse codes needed to represent all the remaining ascii characters? We could call the revised code... err... "remorse" ;-)
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |