[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.28
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Here's the lastest version of the lockassert patch. It includes:
> o MUST_HOLD for all architectures
> o MUST_HOLD_RW for architectures implementing rwlock_is_locked (only
> ia64 at the moment, as part of this patch)
> o MUST_HOLD_RWSEM for arcitectures that use rwsem-spinlock.h
> o MUST_HOLD_SEM for ia64
> o a call to MUST_HOLD(&inode_lock) in inode.c:__iget().
> I'd be happy to take patches that implement the above routines for
> other architectures and/or patches that sprinkle the macros where
> they're needed.

Well one one place? Every single implementation of the request_fn
method from the request_queue_t needs to hold some
lock associated with the queue in question.

In fact you will find ASSERT_LOCK macros sparnkled through the scsi code
already right now. BTW> ASSERT_HOLDS would sound a bit more
familiar to some of us.

This minor issue asside I think that your idea is a good thing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.059 / U:0.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site