Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Errors in 2.4.19-rc3 CML rules (SiS related) | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 24 Jul 2002 14:11:19 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 11:22, Scott Bronson wrote: > 1) CONFIG_DRM_SIS needs to require CONFIG_FB_SIS_315. > Currently, you can select CONFIG_DRM_SIS without CONFIG_FB_SIS_315. > If you do that, you get undefined symbol errors for sis_malloc and > sis_free. > > 2) CONFIG_FB_SIS must be compiled into the kernel (i.e. NOT a module). > Currently, you can compile it as a module. > If you do that, you ALSO get undefined symbol errors for > sis_malloc and sis_free. > > These requirements could be enforced with CML rules. Before I > submit the patch to do this, I'd like to know if that's the proper > fix! Would it be better to just make CONFIG_FB_SIS able to be built > as a module instead?
For the rules - go for it. For the modular driver ping the sisfb maintainer first and check what is in the pipeline.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |