lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout
    Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > The thing is, we cannot change existing select semantics, and the question
    > is whether what most soft-realtime wants is actually select, or whether
    > people really want a "waittimeofday()".

    Actually, I'd like a
    waitonmonotonicallyincreasingnonadjustablehighres64bittime().

    Chris

    --
    Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10
    Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557
    3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986
    Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:2.869 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site