Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:07:00 -0400 | From | Chris Friesen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The thing is, we cannot change existing select semantics, and the question > is whether what most soft-realtime wants is actually select, or whether > people really want a "waittimeofday()".
Actually, I'd like a waitonmonotonicallyincreasingnonadjustablehighres64bittime().
Chris
-- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |