Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: please DON'T run 2.5.27 with IDE! |
| |
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Jan Harkes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 03:58:58PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > > That's actually not true... At least the setting of the > > request rq->flags is significantly different here and there. > > However I think but I'm not sure that the fact aht we have rq->special > > != NULL here has the hidded side effect that we indeed accomplish the > > same semantics. > > > > >And yes it will be useful to move it to block layer. > > > > Done. Just needs testing. I have at least an ZIP parport drive, which > > allows me to do some basic checks. > > Ehh, you are testing all those IDE changes with a ZIP drive connected to > the parallel port? Don't you have any real IDE devices?? I'm sure we can > all chip in and buy you a drive if you need one.
Would be faster to get a real maintainer, but nobody cares about actually finishing 2.5 or they would find one that could actually make it work proper.
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
------------------------------------------------------- 2.4, has crappy code, an arse-hole maintainer, and a working safe driver. 2.5, erm "Two of Three, ain't BAD"
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |