lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2
Date
From
hch@infradead.org said:
> The fastcall definition should go into an asm/ header instead of such
> hacks..

And I'm supposed to fix this as part of the UML patch?

> the disk accounting stuff is also bogus - instead of wasting ram with
> huge array it should rather be dynamically-allocated in a per-disk
> structure..

And this too?

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.143 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site