Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2 | Date | Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:02:41 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> |
| |
hch@infradead.org said: > The fastcall definition should go into an asm/ header instead of such > hacks..
And I'm supposed to fix this as part of the UML patch?
> the disk accounting stuff is also bogus - instead of wasting ram with > huge array it should rather be dynamically-allocated in a per-disk > structure..
And this too?
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |