lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:01:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So what i did in my tree was to introduce the following 5 core means of
> manipulating the local interrupt flags:
>
> irq_off()
> irq_on()
> irq_save(flags)
> irq_save_off(flags)
> irq_restore(flags)

I'd prefer the following:

void irq_off(void);
void irq_on(void);

flags_t irq_save(); /* the old irq_save_off() */
void irq_restore(flags_t);
void __irq_save(void); /* without saveing */
rational: proper function-like API (should be inlines), irq save
without disableing is very uncommon, better make the API symmetric.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans