[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2

On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > i agree mostly, but i do not agree with __irq_save() and irq_save().
> > What's wrong with "flags_t irq_save_off()" - the name carries the proper
> > meaning, and it also harmonizes with irq_off().
> but not with irq_restore :) maybe irq_restore_on() although the on is
> implicit.

think about it - if this was true then irq_restore_on() would be
equivalent to irq_on().


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.238 / U:3.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site