[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2

    On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

    > > i agree mostly, but i do not agree with __irq_save() and irq_save().
    > > What's wrong with "flags_t irq_save_off()" - the name carries the proper
    > > meaning, and it also harmonizes with irq_off().
    > but not with irq_restore :) maybe irq_restore_on() although the on is
    > implicit.

    think about it - if this was true then irq_restore_on() would be
    equivalent to irq_on().


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.022 / U:0.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site